You might also fancy...
Loading...
Create New List
Keyboard Shortcuts
Fill in the form below and we'll email you back with some great gift ideas you can buy right here on Fancy.
Add a Comment
Discover amazing stuff, collect the things you love, buy it all in one place. Sign up today and start curate your own catalog.
Are you a business? Learn more
XCreate Gift Campaign
This group gift will be valid for days. If there aren't enough contributions after days, your contribution will be refunded.

O_o NEEED THIS!!!!!
I want to just try it... then I'll pay the mulah if its really worth it (^.^)
Its always fun to see people with photographical-knowledge discussing... Yes, there was an old .95 lens from canon, but for their rangefinders, no fit on DSLR. The dame with this one, its for leica M, therefore not fitting on a DSLR (register-distance is a bitch), also, you couldnt focus/use a canon 1.2 on a leica. But yeah, keep using instagram :p
Drool
How deep is the DOF on that thing? According to most calculators at 1m distance the DOF would be 1cm in front and behind ... that is one shallow DOF ... good luck focusing that.
Does it work with canon
How can it be more lighter than there's light? I mean how can it let 105% of light pass through?
@cronus f = focal_length/aperture_diameter 0.95 = 50/aperture_diameter aperture_diameter=50/0.95=52.63158 mm
@piotrzdzieblowski ok. Another question - How can aperture diameter be bigger than lens diameter itself?
@cronus 50mm is not that lens's diameter ... it is it's focal length - distance between lens and camera's sensor or film ... however "aperture_diameter" i mentioned before should be called "effective aperture diameter" which means it is not exactly the same size as real diameter of the opening in the iris ... i hope you'll now believe in the existence of this lens ;D